Parkinson’s “Pandemic” Part 2

A Florida Parkinson’s expert relates how five members of her family or close professional circle have been touched directly with a PD diagnosis.

An Alabama health system contacts me for advice on dramatically increasing their Parkinson’s patient-care efforts. The reason? A powerful member of their leadership structure just received his PD diagnosis.

Those examples encapsulate elements that a coming Parkinson’s “Pandemic” might contain. (That head-snapping word came from an expert PD panel early this year.)

Now juxtapose “Pandemic” with this fact: Only 50 neurologists are training in the U.S. to become top-shelf Parkinson’s specialists (Mobility Disease Specialist or MDS for short).

Baby-boomer doctors of all specialties are aging out, retiring from practice.

The Mobility Disease Specialist crisis (my term) looks like this now: Large geographic areas are without any practicing MDS. An example is the almost two dozen counties in Macon and Central Georgia, where I live.

Parkies like me must travel two to five hours to receive treatment from an MDS in Atlanta, Augusta (GA), Jacksonville (FL) or Gainesville (FL).

Metro areas have seen a sharp reduction in practitioners who are expert in PD and are treating PWP, such as San Antonio, which has gone from 20 to 3.

There are numerous disincentives to becoming an MDS.

One is money.

Insurers led by Medicare are not providing adequate reimbursement support, such as payment for “long” patient visits necessary for proper PD care. Long here means more than 10 minutes.

Pharma is withdrawing its already inadequate support for, and from, development of PD medications.

How do we fill the void so that PWP might “live well” with their condition?

It seems logical that non-MDS neurologists, geriatric specialists and generalists will be forced into the gap and must receive much more training in this diabolical, unique to the individual condition. Same goes for related, non-MD professionals, such as PAs and nurses.

Healthcare consultant Kim Blasingame wrote in September that neurology professionals have sounded the supply-demand warning since 2013.

She described the “perfect storm” this way: “The neurology workforce supply is constrained from many sides. Factors including government policy, advances in neurological care, demographic changes, failure to innovate, and changing clinician work/life balance expectations are limiting growth in the supply of neurology patient care. But it is the convergence with another force – demand expansion – that is creating the perfect storm.”

Click to access Neurology-Workforce-Shortage-KB-FACMPE-FINAL-9-20-2018.pdf

It also follows that patient education and self-help efforts must grow, enormously. We are stronger together, as our energized Parkie Tribe in Macon (GA) is demonstrating, led by my Me-Over-PD Foundation.

I explore those patient-led, care initiatives in my and my wife’s just-published book “Counterpunch: Duking It Out With Parkinson’s.” It is available in paperback and eBook.

There is reason for Hope, our life blood. The journey will be demanding, as always with the unwelcome Parkinson’ tenant in our brains.


1 thought on “Parkinson’s “Pandemic” Part 2”

  1. Thanks, Gil. An excellent blog and study that lay out the problem(s) in significant detail. The development of a well-trained and -developed force of APPs may be the real key to quality service availability, regionally accessible, but/and that requires some significant changes in the overall medical/health care juggernaut. As long-term as your personal crusade. Stay persistent and rock-steady! You’re doing really critical work. Best, Bob

    Sent from my iPad



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s